Questions? Feedback? powered by Olark live chat software

Pros & Cons of a Real-Time vs. Asynchronous Hybrid Meeting

Holding meetings is a whole new ballgame these days. You’re less likely to have every meeting participant in the same room at the same time. Instead, it’s almost guaranteed that people will beam in from other parts of the country—or the world. But there’s more than one way to hold a hybrid meeting. Here, we explore real-time vs. asynchronous hybrid meetings and the pros and cons of each type.

What Is a Hybrid Meeting?

In a hybrid meeting, some participants are present in the meeting room, and some are attending virtually. It’s not a fully live meeting, and it’s not a fully virtual meeting either—it’s a hybrid of the two.

Hybrid meetings are increasingly popular in the workplace. Many employers have adopted policies that allow employees to work from home permanently. Many others have opted to allow employees to work remotely for part of the week, with scheduled in-office time. As a result, hybrid meetings are now fairly commonplace—and it’s likely they’ll stay that way.

The hybrid format also remains popular for conferences, summits, and other industry meetings. These types of events— that focus on presenting and discussing information and ideas—are well-suited to the hybrid format. And again, it’s likely that the hybrid format will continue to be used for many of these types of meetings in the future.

Real-Time Vs. Asynchronous Meetings: What’s the Difference?

One of the main challenges of a hybrid meeting is facilitating communication. This is partly because while in-person communication happens in real-time, virtual communication is often (not always) asynchronous.

Real-Time Communication

As the name suggests, this form of communication takes place in real time. There are minimal or no delays between sending, receiving, and responding to information. The only delay is the one required to process received information and form a reply.

This doesn’t mean real-time communication is necessarily tech-free. For instance, while talking in person is a real-time communication method, so is talking on the phone.

The hallmark of real-time communication is that it allows for a continual back-and-forth exchange between two or more participants.

Asynchronous Communication

When communication is asynchronous, it means the sending and receiving of information is disrupted by time delays. For instance, email is an asynchronous method of communicating because of the delay between sending an email and receiving a reply.

Some kinds of communication fall into both categories, depending on context. For instance, an instant messaging app can be either real-time or asynchronous, depending on the behavior of the participants.

Real-Time Vs. Asynchronous Meetings

How does this concept of real-time versus asynchronous communication apply to meetings? Imagine a meeting where one group member gives a presentation in front of the other members.

Real-time: In a real-time meeting, a presentation is given as normal to a live or virtual audience. Afterwards, the group spends time discussing it before the meeting breaks up.

Asynchronous: The presenter creates a digital version of their presentation and makes it available for viewing. The rest of the group views the presentation virtually, at their convenience, and has a group discussion via a Teams channel.

Essentially, an asynchronous meeting is one where people choose when to access meeting content. This format can work both for virtual and hybrid meetings by providing digital content on-demand.

Many organizations have used this strategy over the last couple years, including for industry conferences and meetings. For instance, the American Academy of PAs created an on-demand conference in 2020, with a digital collection of education videos that virtual attendees could access 24/7. The format has been successful enough that the AAPA is still using it in 2022.  

What Are the Pros and Cons of Real-Time Vs. Asynchronous Hybrid Meetings?

Real-Time Hybrid Meetings

  • Pro: The real-time format comes naturally to most people because it’s what they’re used to.
  • Pro: Real-time meetings generally allow for faster decision-making.
  • Pro: Real-time is better when there’s an emergency to deal with, or if there are sensitive topics are on the agenda. Handling these issues in real time means they’re dealt with quickly, rather than potentially drawn out over hours or days. It also ensures everyone’s on the same page by the end of the meeting.
  • Con: Not everyone performs at their best at the faster pace of a real-time meeting.
  • Con: Real-time meetings can force employees to context-switch, which may reduce their productivity.
  • Con: Scheduling real-time meetings isn’t always easy, even when some people are attending remotely. Remote attendees in different time zones may also complicate scheduling.

Asynchronous Hybrid Meetings

  • Pro: Since asynchronous discussions usually happen in Teams or a similar platform, they’re automatically recorded, and are often searchable too.
  • Pro: Employees are less likely to be forced to context-switch to participate.
  • Pro: The less personal format can encourage more reticent people to contribute.
  • Pro: Participants have time to process complex information and ideas and to carefully consider what they want to say.
  • Pro: There are no scheduling difficulties, since people can participate at any time that’s convenient to them.
  • Con: People respond and contribute at different paces. This can make it harder to facilitate a group discussion.
  • Con: Asynchronous discussions tend to be less spontaneous. This can negatively impact team synergy because often it’s when people are bouncing ideas around in real-time that they get the best results.

When to Use Real-Time vs. Asynchronous Hybrid Meetings

Both real-time and asynchronous hybrid meetings have their place. Each has a specific set of pros and cons that make them useful in different situations. Use them strategically to maximize the pros and reduce the impact of the cons.

Real-time: Schedule real-time meetings when your team needs to discuss sensitive subjects or when options must be discussed thoroughly and decisions made quickly. To reduce the potential impact of context-switching, try to schedule real-time meetings at the start or end of the workday.

Asynchronous: Asynchronous meetings are ideal for those times when your team is discussing complex subjects that may take time to resolve. But watch out that discussions don’t drag on for longer than they need to.

Real-Time vs. Asynchronous Hybrid Meetings: Keep Them Both in Your Toolkit

Both real-time and asynchronous hybrid meetings have their place. Each format has some specific benefits that make it useful in certain situations. Keep both these formats in your toolkit, and use them in ways that maximize their benefits.

Rob Cummings

Ready to add a new dimension to your next event?

Mark Yujuico

Senior Product Marketing Manager

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Jody Tatro

Chairwoman of the Board

With over 30 years of industry experience, Jody is the Chairwoman of the Board of XtendLive, driving vision and strategy. Every strategic approach that goes out the door is influenced by Jody’s experience and philosophies on her high standards for client service. Jody is a recipient of the YWCA’s Tribute to Women Award, the Junior League Community Volunteer Award, and is listed in Who’s Who of Women in Business.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Request a Demo

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Howard Citron

CTO

A product designer at heart, Howard has developed consumer and business products, large scale distributed systems, and software applications. With over 25 years of industry experience, he offers senior executives with innovative solutions to their most vexing software and systems challenges. He assists clients by exploring new market opportunities and acting as an internal venture manager within their organizations.

Robert Cummings

Director Of Technology

Robert is an acute and credible tech professional who helps create an invaluable virtual experience. With over 30 years of high-level tech experience, he has a proficient background in sales, market research, and finance. Robert strives to help clients understand the technology at its fullest aptitude and how it can best create a positive and valuable virtual event experience.

Jack Connolly

Jack Connolly

Chief Executive Officer

As an experiential creative director, Jack prefers to draw outside the lines. He tells stories with original content and impactful design to ignite meaningful conversation.

 

Jack brings 20 years of event industry knowledge to ProGlobalEvents. He specializes in building live & virtual platforms for audiences to connect, engage and immerse themselves in the power of a shared experience. His skills range from ideation and concept development to defining an attendee journey through storytelling and design.

Jack understands the creative process is not linear, but a collaborative process between agency and client. He manages teams of designers and technology developers to pioneer impactful brand experiences. His diverse skillset and leadership ensure for award-winning results and memorable impressions.

 

In 2019, BizBash named Jack one of the top event designers in North America. SXSW awarded his work the “People’s Choice in Innovation” in 2021.

Paul Miller

Chief Marketing Officer

Having served in many executive roles for over 25 years, Paul has a client-side perspective of the corporate events industry. He reaches clients through traditional and digital marketing programs and has a high involvement with technology strategies. In his spare time, he is a principal member of the non-profit Gratitude Network that mentors award-winning social entrepreneurs.

Matt Rulis

VP Of Business Development

Spending the last 15 years in sales, Matt has experience managing marketing strategies, campaigns, and environments for a diverse client base. His relentless tenacity and keen eye for detail shapes the renowned vision he has for client service. He focuses on fostering relationships to uphold XtendLive’s customer satisfaction ratings year-over-year.

Dick Wheeler

Chief Executive Officer

Dick is the CEO of XtendLive. He is an entrepreneur, innovator, and compelling force in the fast-growing virtual event industry. With over 30 years of industry experience, Dick possesses the astute leadership that is a sought-after gold standard in the industry. Under his leadership, the team has generated highly successful events for numerous companies while continuing to drive an imaginative vision for client’s virtual event needs.

Scroll to Top